AI Capability Questionnaire — v1

Full question scan · 50 questions across 7 sections (0–T3) · fixture: ai_capability_v1.yaml

Dimensions: AI Usage, Collaboration Quality, AI Knowledge — scored, feed the 0–100 overall score. Context, Enablement & Sentiment, Feature Familiarity, Time Allocation — not scored, reported separately / feed routing & ROI.

SectionAI mapping: whether this question corresponds to one in Section's own 25-question diagnostic assessment (adapttoai-academy/docs/reference/sectionai-demo/assessment-questions.md, transcribed 2026-09-10). yes = same question, same or near-identical wording/options. partial = related construct, wording/options differ meaningfully. no = no SectionAI equivalent — question is Academy-original.

Screen: which of the live questionnaire's 27 screens this question actually appears on — matches "N of 27" in the running assessment, not the 50-row question count above. The frontend (AssessmentRunner.vue) auto-groups 3+ consecutive single-select questions that share the exact same option-code set into one grid-table screen: 15 marks a question folded into a shared grid screen (S1 tool rows → screen 4, all 11 S3 feature rows → screen 15, all 11 S6 hour rows → screen 23); every other question gets its own screen. 8 marks a screen with just that one question.

S0 · context S1 · tools & enablement S2 · usage self-report S3 · feature table S4 · scenarios & knowledge S5 · confidence S6 · time allocation

Who you are

3 questions · dimension: context

code	question	options	SectionAI mapping	screen
s0_name	Your nameoptional · free text	— free text —	no	1
s0_function	Which best describes your function?required · single-select	Finance Commercial/Sales Risk Operations Technology/IT HR Marketing General Management Other (free-text followup)	no	2
s0_email	Email (optional, only needed if you'd like your own results sent to you)optional · free text	— free text —	no	3

Tools & enablement

7 questions · dimension: enablement_sentiment

code	question	options	SectionAI mapping	screen
s1_tools_row01	ChatGPTrequired · single-select Routing input, not scored. Rows 01–03 share the same 4-option set.	Free account Paid personal plan Company account Don't use it	partial SectionAI's #24 "Which LLMs are you currently using? (select all)" asks tool identity only, not account tier per tool. Different question shape — a checklist of tools vs. a per-tool access-tier grid.	41 of 4
s1_tools_row02	Geminirequired · single-select	Free account Paid personal plan Company account Don't use it	partial Same as row01 — SectionAI #24 covers tool identity, not tier.	41 of 4
s1_tools_row03	Clauderequired · single-select	Free account Paid personal plan Company account Don't use it	partial Same as row01 — SectionAI #24 covers tool identity, not tier.	41 of 4
s1_tools_row04	Other toolrequired · single-select	Free account (followup) Paid personal plan (followup) Company account (followup) Don't use it	partial Same as row01 — SectionAI #24 lists Perplexity, Copilot, DeepSeek, Grok, Llama, Mistral, Other as separate checklist items rather than one "other" bucket.	41 of 4
s1_access	Do you know what AI tools are available to you at work and how to access them?required · single-select	No sanctioned tools exist that I know of Tools exist but I don't know how to access them Not sure Tools exist with a clear way to access them	yes SectionAI #21 "Do you know what AI tools are available and how to access them?" — identical wording, identical 4 options (No sanctioned tools / Tools exist, don't know how to access / Not sure / Tools exist with clear access process).	5
s1_satisfaction	How satisfied are you with the AI tools available to you?required · single-select	I have no access Dissatisfied Somewhat satisfied Very satisfied	yes SectionAI #22 "How satisfied are you with available AI tools?" — identical wording, identical 4 options.	6
s1_sentiment	Which best describes how you feel about AI at work right now?required · single-select	Anxious about what it means for my role Overwhelmed by how much there is to learn Excited about what it can do	yes SectionAI #20 "How do you feel about AI?" — same 3 options (Anxious about implications / Overwhelmed / Excited), wording tightened.	7

How you use AI today

7 questions · dimensions: ai_usage / collaboration_quality

code	dim	question	options	SectionAI mapping	screen
s2_usage_frequency	ai_usage	How often do you use AI tools for work-related tasks?required · single-select	Never or rarely A few times a month Weekly Several times a week Daily	yes SectionAI #1 — identical question and all 5 options, verbatim.	8
s2_task_variety	ai_usage	Which of these do you typically use AI for at work?required · multi-select, max 5 pts	Getting quick answers/looking things up Editing or improving text I already wrote Writing or debugging code Creating first drafts from scratch Analyzing data or documents Brainstorming or testing ideas Building reusable prompts or templates I don't use AI for work	partial SectionAI #2 — same 8 options plus one extra: "Vibe coding to prototype" (dropped here). Otherwise identical multi-select.	9
s2_sophistication	ai_usage	Which best describes how you typically work with AI tools?required · single-select	I don't use AI I write a fresh prompt each time I reuse phrasing or a rough template I've built a custom tool (Gem, Custom GPT, Claude Project) I've built an integrated AI workflow connected to other tools	partial SectionAI #3 has 5 tiers too, but splits "reuse phrasing" (ours) into a distinct "maintain a reusable prompt library" tier, giving SectionAI's ladder one more rung of granularity at that point. Same top and bottom rungs.	10
s2_limits	collab_quality	When you delegate something to AI, do you tell it what it may decide on its own versus what has to come back to you?required · single-select	Never. I don't set any boundaries Occasionally, for specific things Usually, with some exceptions Consistently. I set clear boundaries every time	no No SectionAI equivalent — Academy-original, part of the new Collaboration Quality dimension SectionAI doesn't measure.	11
s2_checking	collab_quality	How often do you verify or fact-check AI-generated content before using or sharing it?required · single-select	Never Rarely Sometimes Always	yes SectionAI #10 — identical question and all 4 options, verbatim.	12
s2_context_upfront	collab_quality	When you start a task with AI, do you give it the background it needs up front, or does it usually take several messages to get there?required · single-select	I have to re-explain the same background almost every time I give some context, but often add more as I go I usually give a solid brief up front I always give full context and relevant files/details at the start	no No SectionAI equivalent — Academy-original.	13
s2_completion	collab_quality	Do you typically take AI's output through to a finished result, or stop at the draft and do the last mile yourself?required · single-select	I always finish it myself from the first draft I sometimes let it iterate to a finished result I usually let it go most of the way I hand off through to a finished result and only review at the end	no No SectionAI equivalent — Academy-original.	14

Feature familiarity table

11 questions · dimension: feature_familiarity · not scored

code	feature	options (same 4 levels, every row)	SectionAI mapping	screen
s3_row01	Deep research Claude: Research · ChatGPT: Deep Research · Gemini: Deep Research	Never heard of it Heard of it, never used Used once or twice Use regularly	no No SectionAI equivalent — SectionAI has no feature-familiarity table.	151 of 11
s3_row02	Projects / persistent workspaces Claude: Projects · ChatGPT: Projects · Gemini: Gems + NotebookLM	Never heard of it Heard of it, never used Used once or twice Use regularly	no No SectionAI equivalent — SectionAI has no feature-familiarity table.	151 of 11
s3_row03	Custom instructions / system prompt Claude: Project instructions · ChatGPT: Custom Instructions · Gemini: Gem instructions	Never heard of it Heard of it, never used Used once or twice Use regularly	no No SectionAI equivalent — SectionAI has no feature-familiarity table.	151 of 11
s3_row04	Reusable procedures ("skills") Claude: Skills · ChatGPT: Custom GPTs · Gemini: Gems	Never heard of it Heard of it, never used Used once or twice Use regularly	no No SectionAI equivalent — SectionAI has no feature-familiarity table.	151 of 11
s3_row05	Visual & document generation Claude: Design & Artifacts · ChatGPT: Canvas & images · Gemini: Canvas & images	Never heard of it Heard of it, never used Used once or twice Use regularly	no No SectionAI equivalent — SectionAI has no feature-familiarity table.	151 of 11
s3_row06	Connectors to your own data Claude: Connectors (MCP) · ChatGPT: Connectors · Gemini: Workspace apps	Never heard of it Heard of it, never used Used once or twice Use regularly	no No SectionAI equivalent — SectionAI has no feature-familiarity table.	151 of 11
s3_row07	Plugins / marketplace add-ons Claude: Plugins · ChatGPT: GPT Store · Gemini: Extensions	Never heard of it Heard of it, never used Used once or twice Use regularly	no No SectionAI equivalent — SectionAI has no feature-familiarity table.	151 of 11
s3_row08	Agent mode: delegate multi-step work on your own files Claude: Cowork · ChatGPT: Agent mode · Gemini: Agent mode	Never heard of it Heard of it, never used Used once or twice Use regularly	no No SectionAI equivalent — SectionAI has no feature-familiarity table.	151 of 11
s3_row09	Browser agent Claude: Claude in Chrome · ChatGPT: Atlas / Operator · Gemini: Gemini in Chrome	Never heard of it Heard of it, never used Used once or twice Use regularly	no No SectionAI equivalent — SectionAI has no feature-familiarity table.	151 of 11
s3_row10	Office-suite integration Claude: Claude for Excel/PPT, M365 Copilot · ChatGPT: ChatGPT in Word · Gemini: Gemini in Docs/Sheets/Gmail	Never heard of it Heard of it, never used Used once or twice Use regularly	no No SectionAI equivalent — SectionAI has no feature-familiarity table.	151 of 11
s3_row11	Coding agent in the terminal Claude: Claude Code · ChatGPT: Codex · Gemini: Gemini CLI	Never heard of it Heard of it, never used Used once or twice Use regularly	no No SectionAI equivalent — SectionAI has no feature-familiarity table.	151 of 11

Scenarios & knowledge

6 questions · dimensions: ai_knowledge / ai_usage / collaboration_quality

code	dim	question	options	SectionAI mapping	screen
s4_k1	ai_knowledge	Which of these tasks would current AI tools (ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Claude) handle most effectively today?required · single-select	Predicting stock market performance Reporting real-time breaking news Creating a complete, visually finished slide deck from scratch Reviewing a set of slides for inconsistent formatting and messaging	yes SectionAI #7 — same 4 options, reordered ("Analyzing slides for visual+content consistency" = our "Reviewing a set of slides..."; correct answer is the same option in both).	16
s4_k2	ai_knowledge	You need AI's help with something involving a client's credit file. Which of these actually protects the client's sensitive information?required · multi-select, max 4 pts	Avoiding AI for this kind of work entirely Checking the tool uses secure/encrypted connections Only sharing what I'd be comfortable sharing with a colleague who didn't need the client's name Removing or masking identifying details before sharing Using our company's approved/enterprise tool instead of a personal account	yes SectionAI #9 "How can you best protect sensitive information..." — same 5 options, wording tightened and scenario-framed (credit file) rather than generic.	17
s4_k3	ai_knowledge	When you need to make sure AI-generated content is actually correct before you rely on it, which of these genuinely help?required · multi-select, max 3 pts	Confident-sounding language or specific details as a sign it's correct Professional formatting/grammar as a sign it's correct Asking a different AI tool to check it Cross-referencing outside sources Independently verifying any calculations myself Asking the same AI to double-check itself	yes SectionAI #11 — identical 6 options, verbatim.	18
s4_k4	ai_usage	You need to put together a monthly performance summary from several data sources. How would you use AI for this?required · single-select	I wouldn't use AI for this I'd analyze the data myself, then ask AI to write up the summary I'd use AI to help analyze each source, then compile the final summary myself I'd set up a process where AI handles the analysis and the write-up consistently, every month	yes SectionAI #4 — identical scenario and all 4 options, wording tightened.	19
s4_k5	collab_quality	AI gives you a solid-looking first draft of a memo for the board. What do you do next?required · single-select	Send it essentially as-is, it reads well Tighten the wording, then send it Check the specific numbers and claims against my own sources before sending Go back to AI with more context about the board's actual concerns and ask for a sharper version, then check the result	no No SectionAI equivalent — Academy-original, part of the new Collaboration Quality dimension.	20
s4_k6	ai_knowledge	Which of these four setups would still stop working the day the person who built it went on vacation?required · single-select	A person pastes their weekly numbers into AI and asks it to write the summary each time A person has AI watch their inbox and draft replies, which they review before sending A saved process that reads a shared folder, updates a report, and notifies the team automatically A person asks a colleague to write the summary for them that one week	no No SectionAI equivalent — Academy-original.	21

Self-rated confidence

1 question · dimension: context

code	question	options	SectionAI mapping	screen
s5_confidence	How would you rate your own AI skills, compared to your peers in a similar role?required · single-select	Below average About average Somewhat above average Well above average Among the most skilled people I know	no No SectionAI equivalent. SectionAI's closest item, #23 "How well do you understand AI's potential benefits for your specific role?", is a different construct — clarity of understood benefits, not self-rated skill vs. peers.	22

Where your time goes

15 questions (12 rows + T1–T3) · dimension: time_allocation · not scored, feeds ROI + routing

code	question	options	SectionAI mapping	screen
s6_row01	Drafting or editing written content (emails, reports, proposals)required · single-select	0 hrs 1–2 hrs 3–5 hrs 6–10 hrs 10+ hrs	no No SectionAI equivalent — SectionAI has no time-allocation section.	231 of 11
s6_row02	Entering, reconciling, or reformatting data across tools/spreadsheetsrequired · single-select	0 hrs 1–2 hrs 3–5 hrs 6–10 hrs 10+ hrs	no No SectionAI equivalent.	231 of 11
s6_row03	Searching for, reading, or summarizing documents, emails, or meetingsrequired · single-select	0 hrs 1–2 hrs 3–5 hrs 6–10 hrs 10+ hrs	no No SectionAI equivalent.	231 of 11
s6_row04	Building recurring reports or dashboards by handrequired · single-select	0 hrs 1–2 hrs 3–5 hrs 6–10 hrs 10+ hrs	no No SectionAI equivalent.	231 of 11
s6_row05	Reading something, making a judgment call, and typing the answer somewhere, over and over (triage, approvals, classification)required · single-select	0 hrs 1–2 hrs 3–5 hrs 6–10 hrs 10+ hrs	no No SectionAI equivalent.	231 of 11
s6_row06	Scheduling, status updates, or repetitive internal coordinationrequired · single-select	0 hrs 1–2 hrs 3–5 hrs 6–10 hrs 10+ hrs	no No SectionAI equivalent.	231 of 11
s6_row07	Preparing presentations or decksrequired · single-select	0 hrs 1–2 hrs 3–5 hrs 6–10 hrs 10+ hrs	no No SectionAI equivalent.	231 of 11
s6_row08	Answering the same questions from colleagues, clients, or vendorsrequired · single-select	0 hrs 1–2 hrs 3–5 hrs 6–10 hrs 10+ hrs	no No SectionAI equivalent.	231 of 11
s6_row09	Analysis or modeling in spreadsheetsrequired · single-select	0 hrs 1–2 hrs 3–5 hrs 6–10 hrs 10+ hrs	no No SectionAI equivalent.	231 of 11
s6_row10	Reviewing or checking other people's work for errorsrequired · single-select	0 hrs 1–2 hrs 3–5 hrs 6–10 hrs 10+ hrs	no No SectionAI equivalent.	231 of 11
s6_row11	Tasks that only you know how to do, the ones that would stall if you were outrequired · single-select	0 hrs 1–2 hrs 3–5 hrs 6–10 hrs 10+ hrs	no No SectionAI equivalent.	231 of 11
s6_row12	Other (please describe)optional · free text	— free text —	no	24
s6_t1	Roughly how many people on your team do similar work to what you just described?required · single-select	Just me 2–5 people 6–20 people More than 20 people	no No SectionAI equivalent.	25
s6_t2	For the row where you spend the most time, what would actually help most?required · single-select	Answer me faster when I ask, in chat Take the whole task off my plate, I just check the result Run on its own, and let other people on my team use it too	no No SectionAI equivalent.	26
s6_t3	If you could hand off just one thing from your week, what would it be?optional · free text	— free text —	no	27

Summary: of 50 Academy questions, 9 map yes to a SectionAI question (near-identical wording/options), 6 map partial (related construct, meaningfully different wording/options), and 35 are no — Academy-original, with no SectionAI counterpart. Within Collaboration Quality, only s2_checking (fact-checking) has a SectionAI match — its other 5 questions (boundary-setting, context-upfront, completion, board-memo scenario) are Academy-original. The entire S3 feature-familiarity table (11 questions) and S6 time-allocation section (15 questions) are also Academy-original additions SectionAI's instrument does not cover. On screen count: the 50 questions compress to 27 screens because 3 grid batches (S1 tool rows, all 11 S3 rows, all 11 S6 hour rows) each collapse onto a single screen — confirmed against the live "N of 27" progress indicator.